Strike’s over…?

By Gary Williams, Director of Transportation and Regulatory Affairs 

With the announcement that the U.S. Maritime Alliance, LTD (USMX) has agreed to a 61.5% wage increase with the International Longshoremen’s Association (ILA), a question is likely turning over in the minds of many: “Is the East and Gulf Coast Port crisis averted or only delayed?” 

The ILA in a letter dated Oct. 5, outlined their current posture. 

“If we were to accept the wage increase now, we would have to sign a no-strike clause. … By extending the contract until January 15th, we keep our ability to negotiate and fight for the other important matters that go beyond economics.” 

The other important matters are stated as Jurisdiction Protections and Automation Protections.    

 Jurisdiction Protections are explained as  “securing and expanding our historical jurisdiction.” Guaranteeing that ILA members continue to handle key tasks at port facilities: manning cranes and servicing equipment, preventing employers from outsourcing these jobs to non-union or automated systems. 

Automation Protections would be to prevent the introduction of any remote-controlled or fully automatic machinery that threatens work jurisdiction. 

There is a third component that the Union points to that is to preserve healthcare benefits along with royalty payments designed to supplement wages. Commonly, it has been thought this is not currently at great risk. 

It is important for members to understand that the contract has been extended to Jan. 15, 2025, but even the salary agreement is on a string if the other components are not agreed upon between ILA and USMX.  

Labor is reportedly working at what appears the normal pace based upon information provided on calls that the Specialty Soya and Grains Alliance participated in this week reviewing what has taken place since the ports reopened. 

There currently is no date for resumption of negotiations to begin.