STB adopts final rule on Class 1 rail demurrage billing

Compiled by Bruce Abbe, SSGA Strategic Advisor for Trade and Transportation

While many Specialty Soya and Grains Alliance (SSGA) member shippers would like to see stronger federal regulation of the ocean container carriers and terminals to prevent abuses when it comes to demurrage and detention penalties, they may find a small bit of encouragement from a new federal rail regulation step. 

Last week the U.S. Surface Transportation Board (STB) adopted a final rule that requires Class I railroads to include certain minimum information on or with demurrage invoices and provide machine-readable access to that information. The minimum information includes such things as billing cycle, shipment, care placement, credit and debit information and more. The STB announcement said the aim is to improve “the ability of rail users to review and verify the accuracy of demurrage changes and facilitate the resolution of disputes between railroads and their customers.” 

It’s hardly a revolutionary change, and Class II and Class III rail carriers are not subject to the rule.    

When announcing the rule, the STB stated that demurrage, if properly handled, serves as an incentive to prevent undue rail car detention and thereby encourages efficient use of rail cars in the rail network. 

The National Grain and Feed Association and other associations pushed the STB to create guidelines that ensure such rail penalty charges are commercially fair, practical and commercially reciprocal in nature. The STB, however, did not include guidelines for demurrage and accessorial charges and practices in the final rule. It only addressed minimum information requirements. 

Click here for the announcement from the STB, and here for coverage in Railway Age. 

The Federal Maritime Commission (FMC), which regulates ocean shipping practices at ports and terminals in the U.S., adopted and released “interpretive rule” guidelines for detention and demurrage last summer after a year-and-a-half long study that sought input from all parties. The interpretive rule basically lays out how the FMC will look at disputed detention and demurrage charges applied to shippers and truckers. FMC will look at the appropriateness of such per diem charges based on if they are appropriate to make the transportation flow more efficient.     

Shipper groups and some policy makers, however, have been disappointed that over the past year during the disruptive pandemic-driven congestion crisis and the ensuing import surge that the FMC’s interpretive guidelines have shown minimal results in reforming ocean carrier behavior. SSGA and other ag shipper groups would like to see stronger enforcement steps on ocean carrier and terminal practices to prevent unfair or misapplied per diem penalties on shippers for delays they had no control over.